Analysis: Playing with fire

We are approaching the first anniversary of the July 11 protests, which had a profound impact on the entire power structure in Cuba, as well as its domestic and international legitimacy.

The causes of these events are being debated to this day, producing two opposing interpretations: One is two see it as a spontaneous social outburst driven by the acute economic-social crisis, and the persistent reluctance by part of the leadership to undertake a profound reform of a system that has been inoperative for decades. The other way is to interpret it as an outburst orchestrated and financed from the United States — “the fault,” as it has always been, “lies with imperialism.”

Welcome to our site!
Please consider acquiring a membership to access exclusive content. 

Click
here to subscribe!

0 Shares:
You May Also Like

Anti-Castro caucus calls on Obama

Apparently fearing sanctions-easing steps by the president, 17 members of the U.S. Congress, most of them Democrats, sent an open letter to Barack Obama, asking him to reaffirm his support for the U.S. embargo against Cuba

Ag businesses warn Trump administration about Title III

In a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue, the United Sates Agriculture Coalition for Cuba warned that, if President Donald Trump fails to suspend Title III of the Helms-Burton Act on March 2, "an unnecessary flood of litigation" could "dash the export of U.S. food products to Cuba"